Main Article Content
education management information system, decision making
Purpose of Study: The undeniable fact that information at this time has been viewed as a very potential resource. Infor- mation is the only source needed by a leader of an educational institution. Information can be processed from other sources that are influenced by very complex organizations and owned computer devices.
Methodology: Information processed using a computer can be used by an organizational leader and an individual with expertise as a means of communication and problem solving, as well as valuable information in the decision making the process.
Results: In general from the results of research that researchers do indeed the combination of human resources and infor- mation technology applications that are tried to apply have been done. But this is not an easy matter, of course, depending on the focus of the development of management information systems individually sees the needs that are needed now.
Implications/Applications: After studying and analyzing about the utilization of education management information sys- tem in decision making hence writer concludes that; first, decision making needs good information, second, irrelevant information will cause wrong judgment in making decision, third, the main basis of framework of information system utilization in taking decisions all information presented by the information system should be aimed at supporting certain phases of the decision-making process; fourth, the utilization framework of management information systems in decision making can also be used to assess an ongoing reporting system, fifth, decision making in education is an important part that should be done well by managers or other officials.
Burgos, V. C. G. et al. (2018). Caracterización del discursosobreinnovación curricular en FID enuniversidades de Chile.
dan Biklen, B. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. pages 119–143, Boston. Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Emam, S. S. and Shajari, H. (2013). Recognition and analysis of effective factors on investors’ decision making in stock exchange of tehran. UCT Journal of Management and Accounting Studies.
Eti, D. R. (2006). SistemInformasiManajemenPendidikan,Bandung:BumiAksara, 2.
Jalaludin, R. (1999). RekayasaSosial: ReformasiatauRevolusi, Bandung : PT. RemajaRosda Karya, 47. Komaruddin, S. (1994). Pengantar Manajemen Perusahaan. pages 289–290, Jakarta. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Egon, G. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. pages 289–331, Beverly Hill, Caifornia. Sage Publications, 1985.
Moleong, L. J. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung. PT. RemajaRosdaKarya,135.
Mollaei, B., Gorji, Y., and Rezaei, F. (2014). Comparison of Anxiety, Children, and Single with Two Children in Secondary Schools during the First and Second Year in the Academic Year 2013-2014 of Bandar Abbas. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 2(2):127–130.
Neustroev, N. D., Nikolaeva, A. D., Neustroeva, A. N., and Ivanova, A. V. (2016). Problems and Modernization Trends of
Ungraded Schools of the Russian North. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(10):3415–3424. Robert, K. Y. (1987). Case Study Research Design and Methods. pages 114–115, Beverly Hills. Sage Publication.
Siswanto, H. B. (2010). Pengantar Manajemen, Jakarta :BumiAksara,171. Sondang, P. S. (1986). Filsafat Administrasi, Jakarta :Gunung Agung, 40.
Ulbert, S. (2008). StudiTentangIlmuAdministrasi, Bandung : SinarBaruAlgesindo, 206.