Main Article Content
Financial Management Reform Process, Lüder FMR Model, the Indonesian Village Government
Purpose: The study aimed to examine contingency factors influencing the village reform especially the financial management process.
Methodology: Primary data was obtained through interviews, while the supporting data was gathered from an examination of Indonesian government documents, organizational reports, and academic literature.
Result: The present study found that the primary motive for FMS Reform in the Indonesian village government was the need that was expressed by the Indonesian Ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) as a regulator of Indonesian village government for modernizing the village financial management and reporting system.
Applications: This research can be used for the universities, teachers, and students.
Novelty/Originality: The first FMS reform was marked by the enactment of Indonesian Government Regulation (GR/PP) 72/2005 on 'Village' followed by the MoHA regulation on the 'guidance of financial management system'. These regulations were denoted as a reform from the old village administration system regime to the new village financial management system.
2. Eko, Sutoro. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia [Village Develops Indonesia]. Sleman: Forum Pengembangan Pembaharuan Desa (FPPD).
3. Etcuban, J. O., & Pantinople, L. D. (2018). The Effects of Mobile Application in Teaching High School Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3906
4. Harun, Harun, and Sydney Peter Robinson. (2010). “The Adoption of Accrual Accounting in the Indonesian Public Sector.” Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 10: 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3563(2010)0000010014
5. Ingavale, D. (2013). An impact of advertisements on purchase decision of youth with reference to consumer goods. Advances in management, 3(1),18-22.
6. Leedy, Paul D., and Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. 2012. Practical Research: Planning and Design. New Jersey:Pearson Education, Inc.
7. Mussabekov, G., Auyezov, B., Tasova, A., Sultanbekova, Z., Akhmetova, Z., & Kozhakhmetova, G. (2018). Formation of readiness of future teachers to creative activity in school. Opción, 34(85-2), 569-599.
8. Muyambiri, B., & Chabaefe, N. N. (2018). The Finance–Growth Nexus in Botswana: A Multivariate Causal Linkage. Dutch Journal of Finance and Management, 2(2), 03. https://doi.org/10.20897/djfm/2634
9. Peres, P., Moreira, F., & Mesquita, A. (2018). Are Really Technologies at the Fingers of Teachers? Results from a Higher Education Institution in Portugal. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 3(1), 08. https://doi.org/10.20897/jisem.201808
10. Pollitt, Christopher, and Geert Bouckaert. (2011). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and The Neo-Weberian State. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Prabowo, Tri Jatmiko Wahyu, Philomena Leung, and James Guthrie. (2017). “Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): confusions in implementation.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 29 (1): 104–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B005
12. Yazdekhasti, A., Erfan, N., & Nazari, N. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Spiritual Intelligence and Social Adaptation among Girl High School Students in Shahreza City. UCT Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 3(1), 20-23.
13. Djogo, T., & Syaf, R. (2003, June). Decentralization without accountability: power and authority over local forest governance in Indonesia. In Issues of decentralization and federation in forest governance: proceedings from the Tenth Workshop on Community-based Management of Forestlands (pp. 9-25).
14. Ito, T. (2006). The dynamics of local governance reform in decentralizing Indonesia: Participatory planning and village empowerment in Bandung, West Java. Asian and African Area Studies, 5(2), 137-183.
15. Fauzi, N., & Zakaria, R. Y. (2002, June). Democratizing decentralization: Local initiatives from Indonesia. In Paper submitted for the International Association for the Study of Common Property 9th Biennial Conference, Zimbabwe.
16. McCarthy, J. F. (2004). Changing to gray: decentralization and the emergence of volatile socio-legal configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development, 32(7), 1199-1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.02.002
17. Salim, A., Bulan, W. R., Untung, B., Laksono, I., & Brock, K. (2017). Indonesia’s Village Law: enabler or constraint for more accountable governance?.
18. Bünte, M. (2008). Indonesia’s protracted decentralization: Contested reforms and their unintended consequences. In Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia (pp. 122-143). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934760
19. Nordholt, H. S. (2005). Decentralisation in Indonesia: less state, more democracy?. In Politicising Democracy (pp. 29-50). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502802_2
20. Kurauchi, Y., La Vina, A., Badenoch, N., & Fransen, L. (2005). Decentralization of natural resources management: lessons from Southeast Asia. Synthesis of decentralization case studies under the resources policy support initiative (REPSI).
21. Siry, H. Y. (2011). In search of appropriate approaches to coastal zone management in Indonesia. Ocean & coastal management, 54(6), 469-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.03.009
22. Miller, M. A. (2008). Rebellion and reform in Indonesia: Jakarta's security and autonomy policies in Aceh. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888193