Purpose: This paper aims to elucidate al-Ghazali and Maimonides ontological arguments in proving God’s existence by analysing their theological writings. In the golden age of Islamic civilization, fellow Jewish and Christian were seen to be engaged in theological discourse with Muslim scholars. In adjacent, al-Ghazali and Maimonides were seen playing vital roles in affirming the existence of God in their respective religions.

Methodology: This paper is qualitative in nature and employs content analysis. Both al-Ghazali and Maimonides’ arguments are then analysed comparatively. Comparative theology is done to examine theological discourse as part of inter-religious dialogue.

Main Findings: This study finds that their arguments differ in interpreting the necessary existent which Maimonides’ dual categorization of necessary existence distinguishes their arguments from there onwards. This entails the dual argument by which Maimonides affirmed God is the agent and cause of every occurrence. Meanwhile, al-Ghazālī only affirmed God is the agent through His will and concept of particularization.

Applications: This paper is vital in discussing the concept of God through inter-theological dialogue.

Novelty/Originality: Notwithstanding the significant number of texts on divine existence, the researcher found no study that specifically deals with al-Ghazālī and Maimonides’ discourses on the existence of God. Needless to say, comparisons of the concept of God in Islam and Judaism are very limited in contrast to Islam and Christianity.


  1. Afaqi, Muhammad Iqbal. (2011). Knowledge of God: A Comparative Study of Christian and Islamic Epistemology. Islamabad: National Book Foundation.
  2. Al-Ghazālī, Abu Hamid bin Muhammad. (2008). Al-Iqtiṣād fī al-I’tiqād. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhaj.
  3. ______________. (2008). Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn. Vol. 1. Cairo: Al-Maktabah al-Tawfīqiyyah.
  4. ______________. N.d. Ma‘arij al-Quds fī Madarij Ma’rifah al-Nafs, Cairo: Matba’ah al-Istiqamah, n.d
  5. Burns, Elizabeth D. (2019). How to prove the existence of God: An Argument for Conjoined Panentheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 85 (1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9690-1
  6. Campanini, Massimo. An Introduction to Islamic Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008
  7. Clooney, Francis. (1993). Theology after Vendata. Albany: Sunny Press.
  8. Davidson, Herbert. (1987). Proofs for Eternity, Creation and the Existence of God in Medieval Islamic and Jewish Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Dunya, Sulaiman. Al-Haqīqah fī al-Naẓr al-Ghazāli. Cairo: Dār al-Ma‘ārif, N.d
  10. Gil’adi, A. (1979). “A Short Note on the Possible Origin of the Title Moreh Ha-Nevukhim” Tarbiz, 49.
  11. Grenz, J. Stanley. (1994). Theology for the Community of God. Carlisle: Paternoster Press.
  12. Halevi, Yahuda. (1998). The Kuzari in Defense of the Despised Faith. N. Daniel Korobkin (trans & annotated). New Jersey: Jason Aronson.
  13. Harvey, Steven. (2005). “Al-Ghazālī and Maimonides and their Books of Knowledge” J.M. Harris (ed.), Be’erot Yitzhak – Studies in Memory of Isadore Twersky
  14. Joseph, Onuche & Elijah, Okpanachi. (2019). An Appraisal Of The Concept Of God In Thomas Aquinas. Sapientia: Journal of Philosophy. 10, 192-198
  15. Kamaruzaman, Kamar Oniah. (2010) Religion and Pluralistic Co-Existence. International Islamic University Malaysia: IIUM Press.
  16. Kenny, Anthony. (2010). A New History of Western Philosophy. UK: Oxford University
  17. Laksana, Albertus Bagus. (2019). Naming God Together: Muslim-Christian Theology Of Mercy In The Indonesian Context. Journal of Asian Orientation in Theology. 1 (1), 1-30
  18. Leaman, Oliver. (1985). Introduction to Medieval Philosophy. London: Cambridge University.
  19. Maimonides, Moses. (1963). The Guide of the Perplexed. S. Pines (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago.
  20. Ramadan, Insaf. (2004). Al-Tafkīr al-Falsafī al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dar Kotaiba.
  21. Richardson, Kara. (2013) Avicenna's Conception of the Efficient Cause. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2), 220 - 239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.693065
  22. Rudavsky, Tamar. (2010). Maimonides. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318012
  23. Rudolph, Ulrich & Seidel, Roman. (2019). The Philosophical Proof for God’s Existence between Europe and the Islamic World: Reflections on an Entangled History of Philosophy and Its Contemporary Relevance. Asiatische Studien – Etudes Asiatiques. 73 (1). https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2018-0043
  24. Stroumsa, Sarah. (2009). Maimonides in His World: Portrait of a Mediterranean Thinker. Oxforshire: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831326
  25. Watt, Montgomery. (1963). Muslim Intellectual: A study of al-Ghazālī. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
  26. Wolfson, Harry Austryn. (1965). Maimonides in the Unity and Incorporeality of God. The Jewish Quaterly Review. 56 (2). 112-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1453291
  27. Wolfson, Harry Austryn. (1979). Repercussion of the Kalam in Jewish Philosophy. USA: Harvard University Press.
  28. Wyschogrod, Michael. (1982). Trialogue of the Abrahamic Faiths. USA: International Studies Group of Academy of Religion.